27JUL

One adult in 369 went formally insolvent

3 min read

11:11UTC

The Insolvency Service recorded an individual insolvency rate of 27.1 per 10,000 adults over the twelve months to 30 June 2026, up from 24.2 the year before.

← Back to The distress moved from banks to councils Jump to analysis ↓

EconomicDeveloping

Key takeaway

Households are in work, barely gaining, and running down the buffer that absorbs a bad month.

The Insolvency Service recorded an individual insolvency rate of 27.1 per 10,000 adults over the twelve months to 30 June 2026, up from 24.2 a year earlier ¹. The Insolvency Service is the government agency that administers insolvency law and publishes the statistics monthly. In plainer terms, roughly one adult in 369 went formally insolvent over the year, against one in 413 the year before. Against a UK adult population of around 54 million that is something like 15,000 more people a year reaching a formal insolvency procedure. We calculated that from the published rate; the agency itself prints no such comparison.

Underneath that figure, household finances look thin rather than collapsing. The savings ratio fell to 8.9% in the first quarter of 2026 from 9.6%, meaning households put aside £8.90 of every £100 of after-tax income instead of £9.60 ². Real regular pay grew 0.1% over the year once inflation is stripped out, about £30 a year on a £30,000 salary before tax. Employment held at 75.0% of working-age adults. People are largely in work and barely getting ahead, and the buffer they would draw on in a bad month is smaller than it was.

The Resolution Foundation, a think tank focused on low- and middle-income households, projects typical non-pensioner incomes rising 1.2% in 2026-27, and 4.7% for the poorer half of non-pensioner families, before stagnating again later in the decade ³. Its named mechanism for that later stagnation matters for this register, because it is the same one the sovereign ledger relies on: frozen tax thresholds pulling more income into tax as wages rise, alongside council tax and housing costs. Our trigger on this ledger, declared today, is an insolvency rate above 30.0 per 10,000 adults.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

An individual insolvency is when someone formally admits, through a recognised legal process, that they cannot repay their debts, and their remaining assets or income are then handled according to a set process rather than pursued by individual creditors. The rate, 27.1 per 10,000 adults, means roughly 1 in every 369 adults reached this point over the past year, up from 1 in 413 the year before. It is a rate rather than a raw count specifically so it can be compared fairly across years, since the raw number of insolvencies rises simply as the adult population grows.

What could happen next?

Meaning
The insolvency rate rise likely reflects distress that began building one to two years ago, meaning today's savings-ratio fall may show up as a further insolvency rise in future data rather than being fully captured yet.

Source Landscape

This story draws on neutral-leaning sources

Primary parallel: The rise in individual insolvencies after the 2008 financial crisis followed a similar lag structure, climbing through 2009 and 2010 as households exhausted savings and informal coping strategies before turning to formal insolvency.

Counter-parallel: The 2008 rise coincided with a sharp jump in unemployment; the 2026 rise is happening while employment holds steady at 75.0%, meaning today's household distress is arriving through falling savings and thin real pay growth rather than through job losses, a materially different and arguably more contained mechanism.

The savings ratio fall to 8.9% from 9.6% and the insolvency rate rise are two readings of the same underlying pressure at different points on the distress curve. The savings ratio shows households currently setting aside less of their income, while the insolvency rate shows the households for whom that squeeze already went further, into unpayable debt, a year or two ago.

Read together, they suggest a household finance position that is deteriorating gradually rather than sitting at genuine crisis point.

Consensus view: The Insolvency Service and debt charities such as StepChange treat the rise from 24.2 to 27.1 per 10,000 adults as a lagging indicator of cost-of-living pressure, since formal insolvency typically follows one to two years after a household first falls behind on unsecured debt.

Counter-view: Some consumer credit analysts argue the rate rise partly reflects a regulatory change, easier access to Debt Relief Orders in recent years, rather than a proportional rise in underlying financial distress, meaning part of the increase is procedural rather than a genuine worsening of household finances.

Key tension: Whether the rising insolvency rate is primarily a real-time distress signal or partly an artefact of how much easier formal insolvency routes have become to access.

Sources:Insolvency Service

Mentions:Insolvency Service →Resolution Foundation →

First Reported In

Update #1 · The distress moved from banks to councils

Insolvency Service· 27 Jul 2026

Read original →

Different Perspectives

Institute for Fiscal Studies

The IFS puts about £25bn a year of the government's defence spending path still unfunded against plans announced so far, and separately relays the OBR's costing of the triple lock at £15.5bn a year by 2029-30, roughly triple its original £5.2bn projection. It presents both as fiscal arithmetic, not policy recommendation.

Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy

CIPFA treats the rise in council capitalisation directions, 18 authorities in 2024-25 to 36 for 2026-27, as evidence Exceptional Financial Support has stopped being an emergency backstop and become a routine budgeting tool. It wants a resolution regime for councils comparable to the one banks already have.

Resolution Foundation

The Resolution Foundation projects typical non-pensioner incomes rising 1.2% in 2026-27, and 4.7% for the poorer half of non-pensioner families, before frozen tax thresholds and rising council tax and housing costs erode those gains later in the decade. It reads the tax route out of Britain's debt position as one that falls unevenly on households rather than on the state.

Institute of Economic Affairs

The IEA argues total managed expenditure averaging 44.5% of GDP through the decade is unsustainable, and that holding spending growth to inflation until 2029-30 would improve the fiscal position by £40bn. This is a campaigning position from the free-market right, not a costed forecast like the OBR's.

Elliott Management and Apollo Global Management

The two creditors behind the London & Valley Water consortium offered Thames Water £3.35bn of new equity and £3.25bn of fresh debt on 21 July 2026, betting the regulated utility is worth owning before Ofwat, a public consultation or the High Court sign off. They will still bid even if the company enters the Special Administration Regime first.

Bank of England

The Bank of England judged UK banks resilient to a severe hypothetical recession in its 2025 stress test and cut their required capital buffer by 100 basis points to 13% in December 2025. It expects that resilience to hold even as councils, universities and NHS systems face far harder settlements.